<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for WhoWhatWhy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whowhatwhy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whowhatwhy.com</link>
	<description>Groundbreaking Investigative Journalism That Explores the Truth Behind Current Events</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What Obama Is Up Against by upontheedge</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2010/03/10/what-obama-is-up-against/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>upontheedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whowhatwhy.com/?p=1511#comment-698</guid>
		<description>I am afraid to say that it is much worse then you think.  I believe the teleprompter reading Obama
was groomed for the job from the early 1980s and there is evidence that he was a CIA operative in
Pakistan during his "Columbia University" years where no one remembers him and can't be found
on any student rosters or clubs etc.  Enter "Mind Control" and the many advances that have been made
in this field by these rogue lettered agencies since the days of MKULTRA and we may have our true
"Manchurian Candidate".  No one in their right mind would assemble this cast of Neocon has beens and 
Goldman Sachs pirates to assist him in "Change We Can Believe In" if they were serious and truly in charge.
Some say that perhaps 80 percent of Congress and virtually all Senators are selected and approved by the
Shadow Government.based in the City of London.  We find the CIA involved in every President and Candidate
and the Bush's are heavily involved.  Obama must be regarded as a huge disappointment by those who were
niave enough to actually believe that our system of government is what it appears to be (with help from the
controlled media) but the silver lining could be that average citzens are awakening to the illusion of the false
left/right paradigm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am afraid to say that it is much worse then you think.  I believe the teleprompter reading Obama<br />
was groomed for the job from the early 1980s and there is evidence that he was a CIA operative in<br />
Pakistan during his &#8220;Columbia University&#8221; years where no one remembers him and can&#8217;t be found<br />
on any student rosters or clubs etc.  Enter &#8220;Mind Control&#8221; and the many advances that have been made<br />
in this field by these rogue lettered agencies since the days of MKULTRA and we may have our true<br />
&#8220;Manchurian Candidate&#8221;.  No one in their right mind would assemble this cast of Neocon has beens and<br />
Goldman Sachs pirates to assist him in &#8220;Change We Can Believe In&#8221; if they were serious and truly in charge.<br />
Some say that perhaps 80 percent of Congress and virtually all Senators are selected and approved by the<br />
Shadow Government.based in the City of London.  We find the CIA involved in every President and Candidate<br />
and the Bush&#8217;s are heavily involved.  Obama must be regarded as a huge disappointment by those who were<br />
niave enough to actually believe that our system of government is what it appears to be (with help from the<br />
controlled media) but the silver lining could be that average citzens are awakening to the illusion of the false<br />
left/right paradigm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WATERBOARDING-GATE? by jon</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2010/02/03/waterboarding-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whowhatwhy.com/?p=1491#comment-697</guid>
		<description>I've heard this previously, though it sounds like a good article w/ some new info.  I have a cell phone but try not to use it directly against my head, usually using a bluetooth device in my ear.  

My thinking is that bluetooth transmission is much less powerful than a cell - 20 feet vs a mile or two.  

However, I don't know for sure that theses lower powered devices (bluetooth, wifi, cordless landline home phones, etc.) are safe.  Just have a feeling that they are a lot less strong than cellular, plus I've not seen any science on the weaker signals.  

Anyway, thought this might be of interest - a sort of compromise in our cell world, where you can still benefit from a cell phone but avoid putting it next to your head.  

Still the issue of carrying it around however - as they do check-in w. the local tower regularly.

Thanks for raising the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard this previously, though it sounds like a good article w/ some new info.  I have a cell phone but try not to use it directly against my head, usually using a bluetooth device in my ear.  </p>
<p>My thinking is that bluetooth transmission is much less powerful than a cell - 20 feet vs a mile or two.  </p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t know for sure that theses lower powered devices (bluetooth, wifi, cordless landline home phones, etc.) are safe.  Just have a feeling that they are a lot less strong than cellular, plus I&#8217;ve not seen any science on the weaker signals.  </p>
<p>Anyway, thought this might be of interest - a sort of compromise in our cell world, where you can still benefit from a cell phone but avoid putting it next to your head.  </p>
<p>Still the issue of carrying it around however - as they do check-in w. the local tower regularly.</p>
<p>Thanks for raising the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Fresh Wind by Robert O'Hara</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2010/01/12/a-fresh-wind/comment-page-1/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert O'Hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whowhatwhy.com/?p=1461#comment-693</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Such coverage is so rare that the questions themselves contain more information than the "answers" given us TV viewers. I'm an old man now, but I remember well the Viet Nam protests. One little war but so much noise. This media silence is far scarier.
I wonder how you will stand it, the frustration. I've been following Sibel Edmonds and Richard Gage, for example. What does it feel like to pull back the curtain, shine a light on the string-pullers, and see the dancers go on and on? I both applaud and pity your efforts. 
 
Robert O'Hara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Such coverage is so rare that the questions themselves contain more information than the &#8220;answers&#8221; given us TV viewers. I&#8217;m an old man now, but I remember well the Viet Nam protests. One little war but so much noise. This media silence is far scarier.<br />
I wonder how you will stand it, the frustration. I&#8217;ve been following Sibel Edmonds and Richard Gage, for example. What does it feel like to pull back the curtain, shine a light on the string-pullers, and see the dancers go on and on? I both applaud and pity your efforts. </p>
<p>Robert O&#8217;Hara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Déjà vu, all over again. And again. And again. by David Granton</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2010/03/03/deja-vu-all-over-again-and-again-and-again/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>David Granton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whowhatwhy.com/?p=1500#comment-692</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the update - again and again - it is more than sad it is villainous behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the update - again and again - it is more than sad it is villainous behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hillary&#8217;s Bush Connection by The 9th</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2007/10/18/hillarys-bush-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>The 9th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.whowhatwhy.com/?p=129#comment-632</guid>
		<description>"IN THE CLINTONS’ PURSUIT OF POWER, there is no such thing as a strange bedfellow. One recently exposed inamorata was Norman Hsu"

a copy-editor's nit: "inamorata" is feminine; "inamorato" is masculine.  Norman Hsu would thus be an "ionamorato" I think.

bw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;IN THE CLINTONS’ PURSUIT OF POWER, there is no such thing as a strange bedfellow. One recently exposed inamorata was Norman Hsu&#8221;</p>
<p>a copy-editor&#8217;s nit: &#8220;inamorata&#8221; is feminine; &#8220;inamorato&#8221; is masculine.  Norman Hsu would thus be an &#8220;ionamorato&#8221; I think.</p>
<p>bw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enforced Conformity is Deadly for Democracy by Democracydiva</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2010/01/20/enforced-conformity-is-deadly-for-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Democracydiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whowhatwhy.com/?p=1470#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Yes...do watch...

This:   Psychological experiment with conformity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA 

And then;
This is an Orange
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3898962504721899003#</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230;do watch&#8230;</p>
<p>This:   Psychological experiment with conformity<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.youtube.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA</a> </p>
<p>And then;<br />
This is an Orange<br />
<a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3898962504721899003#" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/video.google.com');" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3898962504721899003#</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Must-read journalism: Cell Phones and You by Bearskin rug</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2010/01/28/must-read-journalism-cell-phones-and-you/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>Bearskin rug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whowhatwhy.com/?p=1481#comment-613</guid>
		<description>Russ, you are right. There are stories which are too big for the corporate media, and this is yet another sign that we are transitioning from  a republic founded on Enlightenment ideals to .... pick yer poison. 

A good book on the potential danger of electromagnetic radiation is Dr Robert Becker's "Cross Currents." Becker was a longtime researcher into what is now called biomagnetics; he authored or participated in some of the early government-funded studies of power lines. The book, published in the early '90s, pre-dates the skein of cell phone towers which now cover the land. However Becker's jeremiad is if anything more relevant today than when it was published. 

Perhaps it is in the nature of things that all growth is self-limiting. Lead glazing is supposed to have done in the Roman civilization; perhaps microwaves will prove to be our undoing. I suspect most people are willing to chance a tumor if that's the price of keeping in touch, getting on an airplane, or surfing the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, you are right. There are stories which are too big for the corporate media, and this is yet another sign that we are transitioning from  a republic founded on Enlightenment ideals to &#8230;. pick yer poison. </p>
<p>A good book on the potential danger of electromagnetic radiation is Dr Robert Becker&#8217;s &#8220;Cross Currents.&#8221; Becker was a longtime researcher into what is now called biomagnetics; he authored or participated in some of the early government-funded studies of power lines. The book, published in the early &#8217;90s, pre-dates the skein of cell phone towers which now cover the land. However Becker&#8217;s jeremiad is if anything more relevant today than when it was published. </p>
<p>Perhaps it is in the nature of things that all growth is self-limiting. Lead glazing is supposed to have done in the Roman civilization; perhaps microwaves will prove to be our undoing. I suspect most people are willing to chance a tumor if that&#8217;s the price of keeping in touch, getting on an airplane, or surfing the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enforced Conformity is Deadly for Democracy by Yongyuth</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2010/01/20/enforced-conformity-is-deadly-for-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Yongyuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whowhatwhy.com/?p=1470#comment-609</guid>
		<description>Classic experiment indeed.  

There is the same hardening of positions about what really happened on 9/11, due in very large measure to professional agents of disinfo, obfuscation, and distraction.  We have the web now and access to plenty of "unofficial" versions.  No excuses not to have done a little homework to extricate the whowhatwhy out of the muck.

One shouldn't need to go much farther than viewing the demolition of WTC7, but if one did . . . there are scores of fascinating subplots and details .  . . why are journalists neglecting the most incredible and spectacular newsworthy stories ever?

This stuff didn't happen 45 yrs ago . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic experiment indeed.  </p>
<p>There is the same hardening of positions about what really happened on 9/11, due in very large measure to professional agents of disinfo, obfuscation, and distraction.  We have the web now and access to plenty of &#8220;unofficial&#8221; versions.  No excuses not to have done a little homework to extricate the whowhatwhy out of the muck.</p>
<p>One shouldn&#8217;t need to go much farther than viewing the demolition of WTC7, but if one did . . . there are scores of fascinating subplots and details .  . . why are journalists neglecting the most incredible and spectacular newsworthy stories ever?</p>
<p>This stuff didn&#8217;t happen 45 yrs ago . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fair and Balanced Nukes? by Curtis</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2009/10/01/fair-and-balanced-nukes/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whowhatwhy.com/?p=1361#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Earlier today (01/23/10), Judith Miller on Fox News said that all reporters whether Democrat or Republican should report their biases so people know. But did she report hers as she pushed the Iraq invasion on us? It's why I laugh when they call the mainstream media liberal. The media prostitute themselves and pimp us out to power, money, and politics. Do not expect the truth from the US mainstream media (including Fox News) on the middle east as they cannot dazzle us with brilliance so they baffle us with BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today (01/23/10), Judith Miller on Fox News said that all reporters whether Democrat or Republican should report their biases so people know. But did she report hers as she pushed the Iraq invasion on us? It&#8217;s why I laugh when they call the mainstream media liberal. The media prostitute themselves and pimp us out to power, money, and politics. Do not expect the truth from the US mainstream media (including Fox News) on the middle east as they cannot dazzle us with brilliance so they baffle us with BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fix The Economy? Toss The GDP by Vickie</title>
		<link>http://whowhatwhy.com/2009/12/05/fix-the-economy-toss-the-gdp/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Vickie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 08:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whowhatwhy.com/?p=1424#comment-604</guid>
		<description>To be honest the Chamber of Commerce is right about one thing.

The CO2 crap is fraud.  There has been "climate change" throughout history.  This is nothing new and has zero to do with the fraudulent CO2 theory (but they will be able to tax you to breath dammit).  It is solar flares.  I remember when solar activity started to cool in appox. 2001 I knew it would get colder and they would eat that one.  In light of all the fraudulent data ect. and the present cooling trend.

People will starve if they get this thing though.  Yes and it will be the most helpless among us and the earth is in zero danger of melting. No I am not making this up.  There is no population bomb either.  This earth could support about 30 billion people.  The resources are there greed, greed, greed and more greed, interrupted distribution channels, war, corrupt government are the real causes of want.  There is really plenty to go around.
What is your game.  It is really solar flares and I do not like the corrupt government or press.  I know this is a scam and I am sure you are better informed than I am.  I could supply a graph and plenty of other data with the actual temperatures on earth for about the last 400 yrs. to prove we were not even out of norms.  There is a direct correlation between solar cycles and activity and temperatures

When you support something that even I know is a fraud (no I knew before the so called front groups came in) it throws any ounce of credibility you have right out the window.

One more time - what is your game?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest the Chamber of Commerce is right about one thing.</p>
<p>The CO2 crap is fraud.  There has been &#8220;climate change&#8221; throughout history.  This is nothing new and has zero to do with the fraudulent CO2 theory (but they will be able to tax you to breath dammit).  It is solar flares.  I remember when solar activity started to cool in appox. 2001 I knew it would get colder and they would eat that one.  In light of all the fraudulent data ect. and the present cooling trend.</p>
<p>People will starve if they get this thing though.  Yes and it will be the most helpless among us and the earth is in zero danger of melting. No I am not making this up.  There is no population bomb either.  This earth could support about 30 billion people.  The resources are there greed, greed, greed and more greed, interrupted distribution channels, war, corrupt government are the real causes of want.  There is really plenty to go around.<br />
What is your game.  It is really solar flares and I do not like the corrupt government or press.  I know this is a scam and I am sure you are better informed than I am.  I could supply a graph and plenty of other data with the actual temperatures on earth for about the last 400 yrs. to prove we were not even out of norms.  There is a direct correlation between solar cycles and activity and temperatures</p>
<p>When you support something that even I know is a fraud (no I knew before the so called front groups came in) it throws any ounce of credibility you have right out the window.</p>
<p>One more time - what is your game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
