Support WhoWhatWhy
FRESH TAKES | news, content and perspective you might not find elsewhere

Judge Rules That ‘Orwellian’ NSA Data-Mining Is Unconstitutional

123WhoWhatWhy has posted a link to the pdf of today’s court ruling on the NSA, here

 

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled today that the government’s bulk collection of phone data probably is unconstitutional, setting up an appeals court showdown about Fourth Amendment rights over the secrets revealed by leaker Edward Snowden.

Leon, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, said that the National Security Agency’s metadata collection violates privacy rights, made a preliminary ruling in favor of five plaintiffs who challenged the practice.

His 68-page ruling included withering words for the federal government, describing the wholesale scooping of data as Orwellian.

“I cannot imagine a more ‘indiscriminate’ and ‘arbitrary invasion’ than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every citizen for purposes of querying and analyzing it without prior judicial approval,” he wrote. “Surely, such a program infringes on ‘that degree of privacy’ that the Founders enshrined in the Fourth Amendment.”

He said the government has not revealed a single instance where the data collection “has actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive in nature.”

The former NSA contractor Edward Snowden praised the ruling in a statement released through journalist Glenn Greenwald:

“I acted on my belief that the N.S.A.’s mass surveillance programs would not withstand a constitutional challenge, and that the American public deserved a chance to see these issues determined by open courts,” Snowden said. “Today, a secret program authorized by a secret court was, when exposed to the light of day, found to violate Americans’ rights. It is the first of many.”

Clearly, the NSA will stay on the front pages well into 2014. The link leads to Leon’s ruling. You can read it — and decide for yourself.

 

You can also get up to speed on other aspects of the attack on our privacy and constitutional rights, by rereading (or reading for the first time) some of the work WhoWhatWhy has been doing on these topics, such as this, this, this and this.

 

 

 

WhoWhatWhy plans to continue doing this kind of groundbreaking original reporting. You can count on it. But can we count on you? We cannot do our work without your support.

Please click here to donate; it’s tax deductible. And it packs a punch.

 

 

Graphics:  hughillustration.com


Comment Policy:
Keep it civil. Keep it relevant. Keep it clear. Keep it short. Identify your assertions as fact or speculation. No typing in ALL-CAPS. Read the article in its entirety before commenting.

Note: As a news site dedicated to serious inquiry, not a bulletin board, we reserve the right to remove any comment at any time, especially when it appears to be part of an effort to push a deceptive, unscientific, false or narrow ideological line. Posts that scapegoat by ethnicity, gender, religion or nationality will also be removed.
More in Criminal Justice, Fresh Takes, Our Investigations (142 of 817 articles)