Support WhoWhatWhy
WHOWHATWHY | OURINVESTIGATIONS

GHW Bush & JFK Hit

bush-sr-cia

What possible connection could there have been between George H.W. Bush and the assassination of John F. Kennedy? Or between the C.I.A. and the assassination? Or between Bush and the C.I.A.? For some people, apparently, making such connections was as dangerous as letting one live wire touch another.   Here, in anticipation of the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination in November, is the first part of a ten-part series of excerpts from WhoWhatWhy editor Russ Baker’s bestseller, Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, America’s Invisible Government and the Hidden History of the Last Fifty Years.  The story is a real-life thriller.

Note: Although these excerpts do not contain footnotes, the book itself is heavily footnoted and exhaustively sourced. (The excerpts in Part 1 come from Chapter 2 of the book, and the titles and subtitles have been changed for this publication.)  

Poppy’s Secret

When Joseph McBride came upon the document about George H. W. Bush’s double life, he was not looking for it.  It was 1985, and McBride, a former Daily Variety writer, was in the library of California State University San Bernardino, researching a book about the movie director Frank Capra.  Like many good reporters, McBride took off on a “slight,” if time-consuming, tangent – spending day after day poring over reels of microfilmed documents related to the FBI and the JFK assassination.  McBride had been a volunteer on Kennedy’s campaign, and since 1963 had been intrigued by the unanswered questions surrounding that most singular of American tragedies.

A particular memo caught his eye, and he leaned in for a closer look. Practically jumping off the screen was a memorandum from FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, dated November 29, 1963.  Under the subject heading “Assassination of President John F. Kennedy,” Hoover reported that, on the day after JFK’s murder, the bureau had provided two individuals with briefings.  One was “Captain William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency.”  The other: “Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency.”

To:

Director
Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Department of State

[We have been] advised that the Department of State feels some misguided anti-Castro group might capitalize on the present situation and undertake an unauthorized raid against Cuba, believing that the assassination of President John F. Kennedy might herald a change in U.S. policy… [Our] sources know of no [such] plans…  The substance of the foregoing information was orally furnished to Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency and Captain William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency.

McBride shook his head. George H. W. Bush? In the CIA in 1963? Dealing with Cubans and the JFK assassination? Could this be the same man who was now vice president of the United States? Even when Bush was named CIA director in 1976 amid much agency-bashing, his primary asset had been the fact that he was not a part of the agency during the coups, attempted coups, and murder plots in Iran, Cuba, Chile, and other hot spots about which embarrassing information was being disclosed every day in Senate hearings.

For CIA director Bush, there had been much damage to control. The decade from 1963 to 1973 had seen one confidence-shaking crisis after another. There was the Kennedy assassination and the dubious accounting of it by the Warren Commission. Then came the revelations of how the CIA had used private foundations to channel funds to organizations inside the United States, such as the National Student Association. Then came Watergate, with its penumbra of CIA operatives such as E. Howard Hunt and their shadowy misdoings. Americans were getting the sense of a kind of sanctioned underground organization, operating outside the law and yet protected by it. Then President Gerald Ford, who had ascended to that office when Richard Nixon resigned, fired William Colby, the director of the CIA, who was perceived by hard-liners as too accommodating to congressional investigators and would-be intelligence reformers.

Now Ford had named George H. W. Bush to take over the CIA. But Bush seemed wholly unqualified for such a position – especially at a time when the agency was under maximum scrutiny. He had been U.N. ambassador, Republican National Committee chairman, and the U.S. envoy to Beijing, where both Nixon and Henry Kissinger had regarded him as a lightweight and worked around him. What experience did he have in the world of intelligence and spying? How would he restore public confidence in a tarnished spy agency? No one seemed to know. Or did Gerald Ford realize something most others didn’t?

Bush served at the CIA for one year, from early 1976 to early 1977. He worked quietly to reverse the Watergate-era reforms of CIA practices, moving as many operations as possible offshore and beyond accountability. Although a short stint, it nevertheless created an image problem in 1980 when Bush ran unsuccessfully for the Republican presidential nomination against former California governor Ronald Reagan. Some critics warned of the dangerous precedent in elevating someone who had led the CIA, with its legacy of dark secrets and covert plots, blackmail and murder, to preside over the United States government.

“Must be another George Bush”

In 1985, when McBride found the FBI memo apparently relating to Bush’s past, the reporter did not immediately follow up this curious lead. Bush was now a recently reelected vice president (a famously powerless position), and McBride himself was busy with other things. By 1988, however, the true identity of “Mr. George Bush of the CIA” took on new meaning, as George H. W. Bush prepared to assume his role as Reagan’s heir to the presidency. Joe McBride decided to make the leap from entertainment reportage to politics. He picked up the phone and called the White House.

“May I speak with the vice president?” he asked

McBride had to settle for Stephen Hart, a vice presidential spokesman. Hart denied that his boss had been the man mentioned in the memo, quoting Bush directly. “I was in Houston, Texas, at the time and involved in the independent oil drilling business. And I was running for the Senate in late ’63. I don’t have any idea of what he’s talking about.” Hart concluded with this suggestion: “Must be another George Bush.”

McBride found the response troubling – rather detailed for a ritual non-denial. It almost felt like a cover story that Bush was a bit too eager to trot out. He returned to Hart with more questions for Bush:

  • Did you do any work with or for the CIA prior to the time you became its director?
  • If so, what was the nature of your relationship with the agency, and how long did it last?
  • Did you receive a briefing by a member of the FBI on anti-Castro Cuban activities in the aftermath [of] the assassination of President Kennedy?

Within half an hour, Hart called him back. The spokesman now declared that, though he had not spoken with Bush, he would nevertheless answer the questions himself. Hart said that the answer to the first question was no, and, therefore, the other two were moot.

Undeterred, McBride called the CIA. A spokesman for the agency, Bill Devine, responded: “This is the first time I’ve ever heard this . . . I’ll see what I can find out and call you back.”

The following day, the PR man was tersely formal and opaque: “I can neither confirm nor deny.” It was the standard response the agency gave when it dealt with its sources and methods. Could the agency reveal whether there had been another George Bush in the CIA? Devine replied: “Twenty-seven years ago? I doubt that very much. In any event, we have a standard policy of not confirming that anyone is involved in the CIA.”

“Apparently” George William Bush

But it appears this standard policy was made to be broken. McBride’s revelations appeared in the July 16, 1988, issue of the liberal magazine the Nation, under the headline “The Man Who Wasn’t There, ‘George Bush,’ C.I.A. Operative.” Shortly thereafter, CIA spokeswoman Sharron Basso told the Associated Press that the CIA believed that “the record should be clarified.” She said that the FBI document “apparently” referred to a George William Bush who had worked in 1963 on the night shift at the Langley, Virginia, headquarters, and that “would have been the appropriate place to have received such an FBI report.” George William Bush, she said, had left the CIA in 1964 to join the Defense Intelligence Agency.

Certainly, the article caused George H. W. Bush no major headaches. By the following month, he was triumphantly accepting the GOP’s presidential nomination at its New Orleans convention, unencumbered by tough questions about his past.

CIA can’t find “other” George Bush?

Meanwhile, the CIA’s Basso told reporters that the agency had been unable to locate the “other” George Bush. The assertion was reported by several news outlets, with no comment about the irony of a vaunted intelligence agency – with a staff of thousands and a budget of billions – being unable to locate a former employee within American borders.

Perhaps what the CIA really needed was someone like Joseph McBride. Though not an investigative journalist, McBride had no trouble finding George William Bush. Not only was the man findable; he was still on the U.S. government payroll. By 1988 this George Bush was working as a claims representative for the Social Security Administration. He explained to McBride that he had worked only briefly at the CIA, as a GS-5 probationary civil servant, analyzing documents and photos during the night shift. Moreover, he said, he had never received interagency briefings.

Several years later, in 1991, former Texas Observer editor David Armstrong would track down the other person listed on the Hoover memo, Captain William Edwards. Edwards could confirm that he had been on duty at the Defense Intelligence Agency the day in question. He said he did not remember this briefing, but that he found the memo plausible in reference to a briefing he might have received over the phone while at his desk. While he said he had no idea who the George Bush was who also was briefed, Edward’s rank and experience was certainly far above that of the night clerk George William Bush.

Shortly after McBride’s article appeared in the Nation, the magazine ran a follow-up op-ed, in which the author provided evidence that the Central Intelligence Agency had foisted a lie on the American people. The piece appeared while everyone else was focusing on Bush’s coronation at the Louisiana Superdome.  As with McBride’s previous story, this disclosure was greeted with the equivalent of a collective media yawn. An opportunity was bungled, not only to learn about the true history of the man who would be president, but also to recognize the “George William Bush” diversion for what it was: one in a long series of calculated distractions and disinformation episodes that run through the Bush family history.

George William Bush Deposes

With the election only two months away, and a growing sense of urgency in some quarters, George William Bush acknowledged under oath – as part of a deposition in a lawsuit brought by a nonprofit group seeking records on Bush’s past – that he was the junior officer on a three- to four-man watch shift at CIA headquarters between September 1963 and February 1964, which was on duty when Kennedy was shot. “I do not recognize the contents of the memorandum as information furnished to me orally or otherwise during the time I was at the CIA,” he said. “In fact, during my time at the CIA, I did not receive any oral communications from any government agency of any nature whatsoever. I did not receive any information relating to the Kennedy assassination during my time at the CIA from the FBI. Based on the above, it is my conclusion that I am not the Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency referred to in the memorandum.” . . .

 George H.W. Bush: Spy from the age of 18

Almost a decade would pass between Bush’s election in 1988 and the declassification and release in 1996 of another government document that shed further light on the matter. This declassified document would help to answer some of the questions raised by the ’63 Hoover memo – questions such as, “If George Herbert Walker Bush was already connected with the CIA in 1963, how far back did the relationship go?”

But yet another decade would pass before this second document would be found, read, and revealed to the public. Fast-forward to December 2006, on a day when JFK researcher Jerry Shinley sat, as he did on so many days, glued to his computer, browsing through the digitized database of documents on the Web site of the Mary Ferrell Foundation.

On that December day, Shinley came upon an internal CIA memo that mentioned George H. W. Bush [the Bush designated Director of Central Intelligence (DCI)]. Dated November 29, 1975, it reported, in typically spare terms, the revelation that the man who was about to become the head of the CIA actually had prior ties to the agency. And the connection discussed here, unlike that unearthed by McBride, went back not to 1963, but to 1953 – a full decade earlier. Writing to the chief of the spy section of the analysis and espionage agency, the chief of the “cover and commercial staff” noted:

Through Mr. Gale Allen . . . I learned that Mr. George Bush, DCI designate has prior knowledge of the now terminated project WUBRINY/LPDICTUM which was involved in proprietary commercial operations in Europe. He became aware of this project through Mr. Thomas J. Devine, a former CIA Staff Employee and later, oil-wildcatting associate with Mr. Bush. Their joint activities culminated in the establishment of Zapata Oil [sic] [in 1953] which they eventually sold. After the sale of Zapata Oil, Mr. Bush went into politics, and Mr. Devine became a member of the investment firm of Train, Cabot and Associates, New York . . . The attached memorandum describes the close relationship between Messrs. Devine and Bush in 1967-1968 which, according to Mr. Allen, continued while Mr. Bush was our ambassador to the United Nations.

In typical fashion for the highly compartmentalized and secretive intelligence organization, the memo did not make clear how Bush knew Devine, or whether Devine was simply dropping out of the spy business to become a true entrepreneur. For Devine, who would have been about twenty-seven years old at the time, to “resign” at such a young age, so soon after the CIA had spent a great deal of time and money training him was, at minimum, highly unusual. It would turn out, however, that Devine had a special relationship allowing him to come and go from the agency, enabling him to do other things without really leaving its employ. In fact, CIA history is littered with instances where CIA officers have tendered their “resignation” as a means of creating deniability while continuing to work closely with the agency . . .

Devine’s role in setting up Zapata would remain hidden for more than a decade – until 1965. At that point, as Bush was extricating himself from business to devote his energies to pursuing a congressional seat, Devine’s name suddenly surfaced as a member of the board of Bush’s spin-off company, Zapata Offshore – almost as if it was his function to keep the operation running. To be sure, he and Bush remained joined at the hip . . .

Devine, like the senior George Bush, is now in his eighties and still active in business in New York. When I reached him in the winter of 2007 and told him about recently uncovered CIA memos that related both his agency connections and his longtime ties to Bush, he uttered a dry chuckle, then continued cautiously.

“Tell me who you are working with in the family,” he asked when I informed him I was working on a book about the Bushes. I explained that the book was not exactly an “authorized” biography, and therefore I was not “working” with someone in the family. Moreover, I noted, the Bushes were not known for their responsiveness to journalistic inquiries. “The family policy has been as long as George has been in office, they don’t talk to media,” Devine replied. But he agreed to contact the Bush family seeking clearance. “Well, the answer is, I will inquire. I have your telephone number, and I’ll call you back when I’ve enquired.”

Surprisingly enough, he did call again, two weeks later, having checked in with his old friend in Houston. He explained that he had been told by former president George H.W. Bush not to cooperate. When I spoke to him several months later, he still would not talk about anything – though he did complain that, thanks to an article I had written about him for the Real News Project (www.realnews.org), he was now listed in Wikipedia. And then he did offer a few words:

Thomas Devine: I just broke one of the first rules in this game.

Russ Baker:  And what is that?

Thomas Devine:   Do not complain.

In fact, Devine had little to complain about. At the time, although I was aware that he seemed to be confirming that he himself had been in the ”game,” I did not understand the full extent of his activities in conjunction with Bush. Nor did I understand the heightened significance of their relationship during the tumultuous event of 1963, to be discussed in subsequent chapters.

No Business like the Spy Business

Before there was an Office of Strategic Services (July 1942-October 1945) or a Central Intelligence Agency (founded in 1947), corporations and attorneys who represented international businesses often employed associates in their firms as private agents to gather data on competitors and business opportunities abroad. So it was only to be expected that many of the first OSS recruits were taken from the ranks of oil companies, Wall Street banking firms, and Ivy League universities and often equated the interests of their high-powered business partners with the national interest. Such relationships like the one between George H. W. Bush and Thomas Devine thus made perfect sense to the CIA . . .

By the time George H. W. Bush founded his own company, Zapata Petroleum, it was not difficult to line up backers with long-standing ties to industrial espionage activities. The setup with Devine in the oil business provided Bush with a perfect cover to travel abroad and . . . identify potential CIA recruits among foreign nationals . . .

“Poppy” Bush’s own role with intelligence appears to date back as early as the Second World War, when he joined the Navy at age eighteen. On arrival at his training base in Norfolk, Virginia, in the fall of 1942, Bush was trained not only as a pilot of a torpedo bomber but also as a photographic officer, responsible for crucial, highly sensitive aerial surveillance . . .

After mastering the technique of operating the handheld K-20 aerial camera and film processing, Bush recruited and trained other pilots and crewmen. His own flight team became part bomber unit, part spy unit. The information they obtained about the Japanese navy, as well as crucial intelligence on Japanese land-based defenses, was forwarded to the U.S. Navy’s intelligence center at Pearl Harbor and to the Marine Corps for use in planning amphibious landings in order to reduce casualties.

The so-called Operation Snapshot was so hush-hush that, under naval regulations in effect at the time, even revealing its name would lead to court-martial. According to a book by Robert Stinnett, a fellow flier, Admiral Marc Mitscher hit the “bulkhead” when he saw that Bush’s team had filed a report in which they actually referred by name to their top-secret project. The three people above Bush in his command chain were made to take razor blades to the pages of the report and remove the forbidden language.

The lesson was apparently not lost on Bush. From that moment forward, as every Bush researcher has learned, Bush’s life would honor the principle: no names, no paper trail, no fingerprints. If you wanted to know what Bush had done, you had to have the patience of a sleuth yourself.

Next:  Part 2.  Viva Zapata

For Part 1, please go here; Part 2, here; Part 3, here; Part 4, here; Part 5, here;Part 6, here; Part 7, here; Part 8, here; Part 9, here; Part 10, here.


Comment Policy:
Keep it civil. Keep it relevant. Keep it clear. Keep it short. Identify your assertions as fact or speculation. No typing in ALL-CAPS. Read the article in its entirety before commenting.

Note: As a news site dedicated to serious inquiry, not a bulletin board, we reserve the right to remove any comment at any time, especially when it appears to be part of an effort to push a deceptive, unscientific, false or narrow ideological line. Posts that scapegoat by ethnicity, gender, religion or nationality will also be removed.
  • Aliza

    Thanks Russ for your hard work and fascinating (and extremely unsettling to say the least) discoveries. Thanks for sharing your information and your time… I just finished your book and I feel like I am finally educating myself about what is really happening in politics… Hastings death really woke me up and made me realize that we need to look carefully at what is going on here and thank you for covering that story as well…

    • Frank von Winkhorst

      What bothers me is that all of this praise for Russ Baker seems to exist in a vacuum, as if hundreds of people had not spent the last 50 years investigating the assassination of John F Kennedy. Many fewer people have investigated the murder of J. D. Tippit, but might I suggest Into the Nightmare by Joseph McBride, which discloses a most interesting series of facts about Officer Tippit, including his peculiar behavior after the assassination.

  • fromaway46

    Anyone know:
    Bush’s phone call to FBI 11/22/63 at 1:45 PM – was this EST or Texas time, whatever that was?
    Phone call was said to be from Tyler , TX – in 1963 how did FBI know call was actually from Tyler? Phone company? Bushes say so?
    Was James Parrott a real person? Was he investigated?

    • Editor

      This topic is addressed in the book, and will be included in a future installment here.

      • fromaway46

        Thanks. I own the book and have checked out this section. Will send questions when installment appears.

  • mithradates

    Why not at least acknowledge Bruce Adamson’s precedence in this research? You’ve both done the world a huge favor; you’ve just better synthesized and presented the information more accessibly…

  • Pingback: Part 1. “Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency” | Soynadie

  • News Nag

    Great stuff here. Thanks for it. I’m going to have to add Family of Secrets to my meager holdings that survive the book purges I make from time to time. Too good not to keep and relish, and as food for thought.

  • poolahoop

    Wow, this is heavy stuff. Gotta get this.

  • sgtdoom

    Ditto on the “great stuff” comments! I had always ignored suggestions on John Lennon’s death, but recently being told that both Chapman (the murder of John Lennon), and Hinckley (the fellow who attempted to assassinate Reagan), both went to a World Vision camp reminded me of Gerard Colby’s outstanding book, Thy Will Be Done, one of the all-time great books out there, along with Mr. B’s Family of Secrets!

    • http://www.911Blogger.com/ Orangutan.

      What’s your suggestion as to the motivation behind John F. Kennedy’s assassination? I’m not even sure I remember what Russ said about it. Please expand if that’s okay. Thanks.

      • russbaker

        Family of Secrets has a whole chapter on motivations.

        • larrypayne

          russ,

          I see above that you indicate when a comment has been deleted. You didn’t do that when you deleted my comment linking a letter JFK sent to the Israeli prime minister months before his assassination. The letter was demanding that Israel allow U.S. inspectors into Israel’s nuclear facility in Dimona. This is all true. Why did you delete the comment?

      • sgtdoom

        While many, many motivations existed (see Mr. B’s book, plus others) and Prof. Gibson has a book which pretty thoroughly runs the gamut on this (Battling Wall Street: The Kennedy Presidency), e.g. JFK’s pumping $4.3 billion directly into the economy via the US Treasury, benefiting the majority, as opposed to the normal passage through the Federal Reserve System, his stands against anti-union and anti-worker, GE and US Steel, the land reform contained with his original proposed Alliance For Progress for Latin America, etc., the subtle but most threatening to the super-rich was his backing of Wright Patman (incredible populist and democratic Representative from Texas) and his study into the hiding of wealth and ownership by the super-rich within foundations and trusts. Patman’s study resulted in a commission to act up this, but since President Kennedy, his supportive power base, had been assassinated, and Nixon elected during that time, Rockefeller lackey Peter G. Peterson was appointed to head said commission, which effectively took no action on Patman’s congressional study/investigation.

        During that study, and the three obvious political assassinations of the 1960s (the Kennedy brothers and Rev. King), there occurred an explosion of offshore tax havens, today referred to as Offshore Finance Centers, thereby allowing the super-rich to offshore much of their wealth and title to ownership, with offshore entities, holding companies, trusts, foundations, etc., etc. (with the unregistered trust form the most egregious to find or research, etc.).

        Today, few if any in America understands, nor even realizes the importance of, the identity of the owners?

        Who owns JPMorgan Chase? Morgan Stanley? GE? AT&T? Bank of America?

        In 1960 the Rockefeller family was worth at least an estimated $30 billion — do you really think their money disappeared, or as Peterson Institute senior fellow, and former IMF stooge, Simon Johnson claims, they gave it all away? (Peterson Institute was founded by David Rockefeller and Peter G. Peterson, to promote the ending of Medicare/Medicaid, and Social Security, and the offshoring of as many American jobs as possible, and the strict adherence of America to the WTO’s Financial Services Agreement.)

        In 1970, the Mellon family was estimated to be the third richest family on the planet: ditto for them and their wealth!

        • larrypayne

          It also might be of interest that JFK had sent a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Eshkol only months before the assassination that Israel must allow U.S. scientists to inspect the nuclear facilities at Dimona to make sure Israel wasn’t developing nuclear weapons. It turns out that they were . . . and did.

          http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/FRUS7_4_63.html

        • LubecLou

          Sgt., I also highly recommend JFK & the Unspeakable, by James W> Douglass, a Catholic theologian. Early on in the book there’s an 11 page timeline of events leading up to Dallas. Even a blind pig could find the acorn in this scenario. Regards-from-the-former-bobdevo.

        • sgtdoom

          Great book, read it and have spoken with Rev. Douglass (although I thought he was a Protestant minister???). His book is among the top three or five which is required reading, but Prof. Gibson’s book(s) blow away all the revisionism about JFK (for anyone who doesn’t remember nor was alive back then), and explain the radical content of his actions and legislation and presidential directives (ever hear of any other prez promoting land reform in South America, etc.?).

          But all the incredible sources, books, etc. overall point to the top five richest families ordering those assassinations (the Kennedy brothers and Rev. King), led by David Rockefeller and his brother, Nelson.

          They created the American intelligence establishment, and they have profited the most from it!

        • Frank von Winkhorst

          I should just point out that Kennedy came into office as a raving warmonger: see “missile gap,” for example. Even as president, he gave a news conference in which he presented a series of charts showing Communist infiltration of the mythical state of “South Vietnam” and suggesting that we step up the number of our “advisors” operating there. I was “alive back then” and “remember” all of this. Only later did he begin to wind down this militaristic approach, after the Bay of Pigs and then the Cuban missile crisis, which almost turned our dear planet into a radioactive wasteland. Please stop telling me that this guy was the reincarnation of Jesus Christ.

        • sgtdoom

          The facts speak against your comments. Yes, JFK had to out hawk Eisenhower, the general from WWII, who also, as a colonel, led the assault to disperse the Bonus Marchers from WWI!

          Yes, he was led to believe in the Domino Theory of Southeast Asia, but instead backtracked, and we know from declassified memos to both the US State Department and through the Pentagon’s int’l teletype network, JFK was planning to withdraw all advisors from Vietnam beginning in late November of 1963, before his presidential reelection campaign (I know this from having met a US Navy tech, and an USAF tech, separately, who had both read this memo while in the military.
          We were later reminded of this back when Richard Parker, of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, began his book tour back in the early 2000s, for his biography on John Kenneth Galbraith.

          By today’s standards, President Kennedy was a radical progressive to the max! For all those reasons I previously stated, and you are free to verify at your leisure.

          David Talbot’s Brothers clearly explains this is one book, as does Donald Gibson’s Battling Wall Street: the Kennedy presidency, with sources listed that again can be verified at your leisure.

          I am not a believer in Jesus, so I would follow Voltaire’s pronouncement that “comparisons are odious”!

          Likewise, I don’t follow the revisionist bullcrap on the Kennedy brothers and Rev. King which has become an industry in itself, thanks to certain financing from hedge funds, etc.

          You stand corrected, sir!

      • Frank von Winkhorst

        Jim DiEugenio’s latest revision of Destiny Betrayed goes into motivations as well as, if not better than, Jim Douglass. To keep it country simple, however, as Len Osanic has often said on Black Op Radio, “his enemies killed him.” So it’s just a matter of identifying his worst enemies.

    • Imsayingnothing

      It should be noted that the Hinkley family was very good friends with the Bush family and there was a motive on the part of the Bush family. Nathaniel Blumberg wrote a book about this. I have no idea about Lennon though I’m pretty sure that it was Chapman, political motives would not surprise me, and definitely it was not Stephen King.

  • Pingback: George H.W. Bush of the CIA | Michigan Standard

  • Rich Stark

    was there a Bush on the grassy knoll?

    • LocalHero

      Don’t think so but there is a pretty convincing photo of him being in Dallas that day.

    • Frank von Winkhorst

      There were many bushes on the Grassy Knoll, behind one of which was the fellow who fired the fatal shot using a high powered rifle, not some war surplus Italian medium powered “humanitarian weapon.” ;-)

  • Rich Stark

    a long standing feud between Joe Kennedy and Prescott Bush over the McCarthy list of communist sympathizers with the Bush name on it and the close relationship with Joe Kennedy and McCarthy.

  • jim

    Do a search: Deathbed confessions, photos support claims that George H. Scherf(f), Jr., was the 41st U.S. president
    This will curl your toes.

    • russbaker

      The truth is shocking enough, no need for such fiction.

      • SO

        What do you care about truth?

        • Frank von Winkhorst

          He’s a reporter. Truth, in his little world, is determined by whether it has appeared in a major daily newspaper or some online equivalent, which is apparently the goal of this website–to somehow establish the truth by putting it in print. Again, the world didn’t magically become spherical when the news finally appeared in the Vatican Daily Dispatch. I would suggest that at this point in history, the newspapers and their reporters have made themselves totally irrelevant by their continued parroting of governmental lies and mythologies. In short, printed newspapers are no longer good for anything beyond wrapping fish and chips. And their online equivalents? A good laugh and a way of predicting the next illegal foreign invasion.

      • LocalHero

        How do you know it’s fiction unless you read it and weigh the evidence?

        • JimGlover

          How do you know Russ hasn’t seen this?

          I just did the problem is the young man in the navy uniform in the center does not look anything like Poppy Bush and there are photos of Bush when he was young.

          The photo shows a dark hair and a wide shape head and wide shape nose… sorry no match.

        • Frank von Winkhorst

          shapeD. wide shapeD.

        • JimGlover

          Why do you think you are a local hero?

      • Frank von Winkhorst

        Considering that John Armstrong has unearthed a massive amount of evidence that there were two Lee Harvey Oswalds, I would not off handedly throw out any possibilities in this case, especially those involving substitutions of important personalities.

  • disqus_eEbPU3IGDU

    My father was a lawyer. While he was still alive he remarked to me that there is an old saying among lawyers: “Murder will out.” My father explained to me that this saying means that whenever a serious crime is committed, sooner or later the truth has a way of coming out. Over the long haul it’s pretty difficult to keep serious crimes covered up. It looks like my father was right.

    • LocalHero

      Let’s hope.

    • Frank von Winkhorst

      I must say, this business about “solving” the assassination, or whether the truth “will out,” or whether there will be another “honest” investigation, is getting rather old. The assassination has been solved, the truth has come out, and there has been an honest investigation. It is just that all of the above have been carried out by independent civilian researchers and not by governmental “authorities” that the large number of folks with authoritarian personality structures in the U.S. equate with the establishment of truth.
      I would remind you all again that the spherical shape of the earth was not established when the Church finally decided that Aristotle wasn’t always right. It was clear long before that and only the most insect-minded authoritarians required that final admission to stop taking the flat earth theory seriously. Those capable of independent thought had simply taken the work of civilian researchers seriously and incorporated their conclusions into their worldview and gone on from there. I would suggest that we do the same with the matter of the Kennedy assassination and stop pretending that there is still something to be established.
      There is nothing to be established beyond minor details. And there is no “reporting” to be done, as the owner of this website continues to insist. The reporting was long ago done by folks like Mark Lane, Jim Garrison, and Jim DiEugenio. KIndly stop worrying about whether the Church has admitted that the earth is round. Nobody with any sense really cares.

  • suezz

    ““I was in Houston, Texas, at the time and involved in the independent oil drilling business. ”

    Roger Craig a deputy in dallas on Nov 22 1963 partner arrested a man who identified himself as an indpendant oil man from Houston. Almost the exact language and of course Roger Craig committed suicide with a shotgun to the head in the 70′s.

    • JimGlover

      I don’t think Roger arrested an oil man from Houston and didn’t arrest Poppy Bush did he? But mob guy, Jim Braden was arrested out side the Dal/tex building and claimed he was an oil man. You may find something here: http://22november1963.org.uk/roger-craig-when-they-kill-a-president.

      The look -alike standing out side the Book Building was not Bush he was a younger Dallas police detective wearing a plaid sport jacket and much shorter than 6’2” Bush. On close up the detective had an almost pug nose and weak chin which is not Bush who wanted to get elected to the Senate at the time and would never be caught dead at the scene of the crime. One more thing about Bush… he ain’t stupid.

      • onedavide

        ?? compare that pic (the one outside the tsbd, not the one close by where he’s waiting 4 gen. landsdale to finish talking to uniformed police officer) to one of bush early in nixon white house, 5-6 years later, same pose, exactly same facial features. Initially i had same feeling re: pug nose/ weak chin…i’ve determined it’s simply the angle that causes it to appear different.

        • JimGlover

          No, the one in front of the Book Depository building where the man is looking to his right had a plaid jacket and looked in his 20’s, in other photos in a crowd he was average height… Bush is 6’2”.

          Sorry, you can believe what you want to believe. You can even believe he was a German Nazi smuggled into the US to become president too.
          You can believe 9/11 was brought down by drones and just to make sure, the buildings were implanted with Nano Thermite, mini Nukes and the latest is energy directed weapons… But I knew Bush and he is not that stupid to be standing around at the crime scene so that he could be photographed. He wanted to get elected Senator not caught at the crime scene when he was against JFK.

          He wanted to be president in 52/53 when he was working on me… unsuccessfully as I defied him and told my family, friends and teachers at school and the FBI found out but my dad would not talk to them.

          Over reaching helps the Bushes and it always does… Like Dan Rather found out. They give you what you want to believe so that you discredit the real story.

          Barbara said it best, “We have had enough Bushes!”

        • Frank von Winkhorst

          Funny, but Ed Lansdale appears to have been stupid enough to have been standing around in Dealey Plaza that day, allowing himself to be photographed. Of course, Lansdale’s problem was different from Bush’s. If Lansdale were in fact running the operation on the ground, he would have had to have been standing around.

        • JimGlover

          It could be Lansdale but all you could see was his back not his face. I think David Atlee Phillips ran the operation in Dallas and Chile but he was camera shy too.

        • Frank von Winkhorst

          Col. Fletcher Prouty and his boss, Gen. Victor Krulak, both of whom worked down the hall from him at the Pentagon, identified the person in the photograph as Lansdale, based on the peculiar shape of his head, his stilted manner of walking, and his ever present school ring. Whether or not there is some subtle interaction going on between Lansdale and the “tramps,” as some have suggested, it’s pretty obvious to me who this guy is. And despite Prouty’s claim that he didn’t know what Lansdale was doing there, that one is fairly obvious.

        • JimGlover

          I didn’t say it wasn’t Lansdale and Prouty was great. But Lansdale knew a camera was there and didn’t turn around and face the camera like, “Hi Folks, it’s me!”

          Phil is the only one so far who knew about a plot and wanted to be filmed because he was not there to kill anyone. Everyone knows there were Connected people there.

        • Jeff Grotke

          Jim you are ignoring the fact that ALL of the conspirators had to have blood on their hands. That is why Nixon was flown into town. He knew even though he left he could never say anything because he had been at the meeting. Anybody with any link had to be there, so nobody could deny it and finger the others. Being on the street was a mere formality.

        • JimGlover

          Im not ignoring anything… my friend Phil was there as an observer and wanted to be photographed which I Posted below. But, after the cover-up he thought we would be killed if we talked so we were cautious as many witnesses were taken out one way or the other and I had too many close calls for comfort.

          Maybe I must apologize for not bein dead myself.

          They have many ways of putting pressure on you but basically they feel they have impunity when the president and FBI orders the cover-up for “National Security”.

          “Anyone with a link had to be there”???

          I don’t think they would want the public to know anything about what, when, why, or where they were… that is how this is done… no evidence of conspiracy must be let out.

          Hunt was there but was camera shy like David Atlee Philips. Not one shooter showed his face because they were not stupid and they all knew one thing…they had a single patsy all set up. Nixon got out of town without posing for the camera in Dealey. Believe what you want… that is the idea for cover-up. You think you see something or somebody but hard to prove…yep!

      • Jeff Grotke

        the man in front of the TBSD is taller than several people around him. Also, there are some cinder blocks behind his head, that are cored out. Those blocks could be used as points of reference to establish his height.

        • JimGlover

          I don’t see him taller than average and The blocks were points of reference to show that one of the tramps was Howard Hunt… but the tramps were not up against the wall and the tramp was not Hunt although Hunt confessed to being a “bench sitter” in the coup.

          Hunt was Camera shy too.

          As far as it being Bush, even the texture of the hair is different (thick) and hairline different, nose too short, chin weak in Profile… he looks young, Bush was around 37 at the time. No matter how tall you think he is there is no proof he is 6’2” and there is no match close up only from a distance is there a resemblance… at first many years ago I thought it was Bush but the Blow-up proved me wrong. I wanted to believe too but as a witness to parts of the operation I can’t go with the crowd and be credible.

          Lets say you are right and I am wrong. If it was Bush and he knew he was caught he could say I called the FBI and told them I’m goin to Dallas and get some facts… than he would be a hero right? This proves nothing even if it was him which I know it was not and I would like to believe the crowd. When you are a witness you can’t afford much speculation.

          I have my own belief from memory about Bush as well as research… most research when it comes to identifying people photographed in Dealey is all over the map.

          Believe what you want to believe… everybody else does.

      • BenH

        MANY think he “is” stupid. The only reason he’s gotten by with all his crimes is Tesla technology and the Looking Glass. Here’s hoping all his crimes come back to him ten-fold.

  • Pingback: » Blog Archive » Family of secrets

  • Pingback: Jewish Watch Australia » George H.W. Bush of the CIA

  • Pingback: George H.W. Bush of the CIA | Thought FTW

  • Barbaracvm

    What angers me more than words can say is: they murdered JFK, no fan of, that set LBJ up to kick into high gear the Southeast Asia (Vietnam) War is the murder of all those in connection with the war. All those lives lost because of the greed for power and money. I used to have some respect for the Bush’s not now. They are no better the various mobs who did pull the trigger.

  • Pingback: Be grateful JFK got elected in 1960 instead of Nixon - Page 3 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

  • ceejo

    Great book, I’ve owned the hardcover for three years. Anyway, here’s an article that lays out the connections between the Lennon assassination and certain intelligence agencies. It’s unusually located in an audio publication, but here you go:

    http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue22/cjdiaries_lennon.htm

    • SO

      Yep. I think they killed Lennon, too. It may seem silly to some, but Lennon and the Beatles were an amazing phenomenon and “Working Class Hero” is a call for class warfare. Lennon was making a comeback and these creeps didn’t want him back. Of course they killed him. Poppy was going to be president in a few months; at least, that was the plan. They didn’t need no John lennon rousing the rabble. They already killed the 60′s, and they wanted it to stay dead.

      • ceejo

        It seems to me that your views were not gained from reading the article. So… read it!

        • SO

          I was responding to a comment. Read it.

        • SO

          Your hero COVERS the news. He doesn’t UNCOVER it.

  • Pingback: NO TAPER / Athenians put people into two categories: 1) inquiring minds 2) living dead / lazy w/ socialism / BRICS “Indie Internet” | paulthepaperbear

  • SO

    The message of Baker’s book seems to be that life is just so evil that we might as well accept that the pigs will rule us. After all, our pigs are kinder and gentler than most pigs are to their slaves.

  • Brian

    ‘Family of Secrets’ is hands-down the best book out there regarding the George H.W. Bush connection to JFK’s assassination. Poppy Bush’s hidden life and phony persona is well researched and exposed here, along with a treasure trove of Bush family shenanigans that stretches from W all the way back to his great grandfather, Sam Bush.
    Every American should read this book – it should be taught in every high school in America.

  • LubecLou

    Also check out JFK and the Unspeakable. In early 1961, Allen Dulles came to Kennedy with a plan to first-strike the Russians with nukes; it would have killed 130,000,000 civilians. JFK walked out of the meeting. Then he warned Dulles he would not commit troops to support the Bay of Pigs. Dulles thought he could force JFK to commit once he had boots on the ground. JFK wouldn’t back down, the invasion failed, and he fired Dulles as head of the CIA, saying he would : “smash the CIA into 1,000 pieces and scatter it to the winds.” In late 1963, he ordered 1,000 troops out of Nam by year end and all troops out by 1965. Then he went to Dallas. You do the math.

    Dulles was named to guide the Warren Commission. You do the math. The connection between the Dulles boys and the Bush/Walker family is well documented. When FDR seized Bush assets in 1942 for doing business with the Nazis, John Foster and Allen Dulles represented Bush. The Dulles boys also represented Standard of New Jersey (Esso, now Exxon) when the government seized Esso assets for providing tetraethyl lead to the Luftwaffe for high-octane aviation fuel.

  • Pingback: Bush Sr. and the CIA | Piece Of Mind

  • JimGlover

    I was the first person to report to anyone who would listen that I saw Poppy Bush talking with Hoover that late afternoon of coup day on the Shadow chartered Hollywood Hootenanny Tour bus. I knew Bush because he wanted me to spy on my family in 52/53 while he was in Cleveland with his son, Little W, I call him Little Bush, when we all played football in the park and on the Golf course in Willowick Ohio. If I wasn’t forced onto the bus soon after i was told President Kennedy was dead, I would have been spared the extra danger of seeing this meeting and much more later. Within weeks in Hollywood My boss Andy Williams asked me what I saw in Texas and I told him it was a government operation. At the time I did not know that Andy was a good Friend of RFK.

    Allen Dulles was pretending to be a Communist by the name of Jack LaBlanc around early 47 with his identifiable cut off left Shoe like a Clubfoot and was giving my dad orders in front of me to burn CPUSA Documents in our basement furnace on 95th St. Cleveland. So I was on the radar of knowing too much and too many people since i was a kid.

    I was first told of the plot months before Dallas by my friend Phil Ochs who was secretly (of course) working for National Security. JFK was warned not to go to Dallas but went anyway.

    Poppy and Barbara got on the bus I was earlier forced onto after a secret pickup at the Hobby (through the fence) Airport in Houston. This airport was about a fifteen minute drive from Bush’s home after the meeting with Hoover.

    I have concluded from the time restraints that the “sensitive” call From Bush in Tyler, where he was speaking about how soft JFK was on Cuba, to the FBI in Houston and left his address in Houston and his hotel in Dallas where he said he was returning was to give Hoover a place like the hotel to exchange messages on how they could hook up when I eyeballed them some time later. I think Hoover knew I knew Bush and wrote both memos because he knew there was a coup and this was a way to make sure Bush would go along with the cover-up.

    Just ask yourself what kind of chance would Bush have in politics if the Warren Commission had asked him to swear to tell the truth… including Hoover who never let the WC know about these memos. I thought I would be killed that day as strangers were celebrating into the night at the Pines Motel in an isolated part of the Sam Houston National Forest right next door to a fenced in National Guard Armory. So about the time I was told JFK was Dead, it was just a short time after my friend Phil was in Dealey Plaza standing in the street on the corner of Elm and Houston as the Limo turned left and passed him as JFK waved in his direction and the first shot was heard. More about that, Bush, Devine, Zapata and John Train here: http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2013/05/phil-ochs-at-dealey-plaza.html

    I would love it if the FBI questioned Bush, Barbara and me about where we were that day, what we knew, and when we knew it as a follow up on what I reported to them at FBI headquarters in Tampa when I was running against Poppy as a write-in candidate in 91.

    Russ, have a good time in Dallas and give them my best from an old Jim and Jean/Andy Williams Good Time Singer.

    • Andreas Schlüter

      “Family of Secrets” is included in these
      books
      which really help to understand present day World Politics
      &
      Geostrategy:
      http://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/08/28/must-read-if-you-want-to-understand-present-day-politics/

      Added
      should be “The Price of Inequality by Josepf E.
      Stiglitz: http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-price-of-inequality

      Andreas
      Schlüter

      Sociologist

      Berlin, Germany

      • JimGlover

        Russ’s research has helped me connect the dots of what I went through and realize it was real and I am no longer alone in this like I used to feel before the Bush Crime family was investigated.

        I have written to Obama about this and Russia knew all along that I was telling the truth and the plan behind the JFK coup even secretly from LBJ was to keep the cold war going and blame it on the communists because LBJ at the least knew the coup was on. I grew up as a Cold War kid and have been fighting this all my life and finally I see peace is possible.

        Oleg Kalugin even visited me at 55 Leroy St in the village and asked me to spy for Russia and left happy when I said, “I don’t spy for any country, I spy for everybody”.

        They easily could have found out through my Dad’s friend Gus Hall who I talked to about this and my Mom’s folks were from Belarus where Oswald met Marina.

        I don’t believe in coincidences.

  • heinrich6666

    The assertion that Nixon and Kissinger thought of H.W. as a lightweight may be true. But I was struck by a passage in Nixon’s memoirs (or a book on Nixon, I don’t recall) that I came across some years ago. When all three were in Beijing, Nixon joked that Bush would be president in 1980. They all laughed. It was not that the comment was funny because it was impossible. Rather, it was the shrewd laughter of old political hands. The sense that I got from reading it was that Nixon thought it was highly likely that Bush would indeed become president.

    • david t.krall

      from : david t. krall
      email: truthatlarge@hotmail.com

      heinrich6666, this is an excellent point you make…
      not surprised at all by this…my own research for over 4o years continues to give me insights such as yours…
      2 weird things I came across in the last few years or so
      about GHWB aka “41″:
      1) at the time of Richard Nixon’s, I think it was his FIRST
      inaugural of Jan. 1969, GHWB went to Texas INSTEAD of (!!!???) the swearing in and festivities for RMN…Here was a true rising star, one gaining a fast track of notoriety within Republican party circles and the son of a prominent Republican and former Senator with major/mega connections. now keep this in mind…you would think it it would be anticipated that GHWB would be and expected to be in Washington. D.C on Jan 20. 1969, right? Oddly he went to Texas for some reason
      and either as the primary reason or a secondary reason he met with LBJ instead…either way, why???
      2) this is also confirmed as LBJ saw GHWB at the
      airport (!) when he, LBJ, and Lady Bird and the rest of the LBJ entourage arrived in Texas (not sure which airport?)… so he must have been at least very familiar with him,GHWB, to have spotted him out or maybe even to have greeted each other??? Either way what was Bush relaying to LBJ, at almost the very time that RMN was being inaugurated??? Upon seeing / noticing GHWB, LBJ, according to a recent book I read in my library said something to the efffect,…”he did some good things for us…” This is akin to Tom Dewey planning to “quietly go to AC give advise /counsel, and warn (?) LBJ (not that he needed it !) but still “making sure (?)” as to LBJ -NOT- allowing RFK to “stampede” take over the Demo. convention in Atlantic City by allowing the scheduled speech and tribute by RFK for JFK BEFORE LBJ’s confirmed and affirmed Presidential Demo/ Convention Nomination…If there were ever (among many ) 2 ST’ers it was Tom Dewey and GHWB…Many, if not most, of Tom Dewey’s DA & Gov’s staff went to work as intelligence ops in WWII…geeze
      I wonder “who” they worked under?…maybe near Bern,
      Switzerland???…what they learned from “the trade”, when they returned, they combined with their legal “expertise” and this was how events and institutions got “injected and infected” (effected & affected!)
      as the cold war gradually “heated up” and lated exploded in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963, among other
      places….
      from: david t. krall
      email truthatlarge@hotmail.com

  • Andreas Schlüter

    The extremely informative book “Family of Secrets” is included in these
    books
    which really help to understand present day World Politics
    &
    Geostrategy:
    http://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2012/08/28/must-read-if-you-want-to-understand-present-day-politics/

    Added
    should be “The Price of Inequality by Josepf E.
    Stiglitz: http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-price-of-inequality

    Andreas
    Schlüter

    Sociologist

    Berlin, Germany

  • Torstentopp

    Well Barack Obama’s background is also CIA, so it seems that CIA has run the country for like the last 15 years.

    See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Lrq9OAOsZ0

    1:30 into the clip. The clip is a talk by the renowned Australian journalist John Pilger.

  • Frank von Winkhorst

    I have pointed this out before, but it bears repeating. A gentleman in one of the “three tramps” photos of November 22, 1963, has been identified by both Col. Fletcher Prouty and Gen. Victor Krulak as air force Gen Ed Lansdale, whose assignments for the CIA involved overthrowing foreign governments and planting evidence for believable alternative scenarios.

    • JW

      Actually Lansdale can be seen holding something in his hand and possibly an earpiece as he walks by the tramps, one of whom appears to be smiling (In recognition of his handler/superior?)

  • JimGlover

    Neil Young was Phil’s Friend too.

  • Pingback: Skull & Bones | Sharing Liberty

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 2: Skull and Bones Forever - Investing Video & Audio Jay Taylor Media

  • MJ12

    Fantastic read! Thank you. We should all be versed in the history of the intelligence agencies. So important…

  • Pingback: Skull & Bones | Michigan Standard

  • Pingback: Jewish Watch Australia » Skull & Bones

  • Pingback: Where was Poppy on Nov. 22, 1963? | Michigan Standard

  • Pingback: Dallas Clarke's Judicial Watch » Where was Poppy on Nov. 22, 1963?

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 4: Barbara’s Hair-Raising Day - Investing Video & Audio Jay Taylor Media

  • Pingback: George H.W. Bush of the CIA

  • Pingback: Barbara Bush and the JFK Assassination
 | Michigan Standard

  • Pingback: Barbara Bush and the JFK Assassination | Sharing Liberty

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Be united to stop the illuminaties in Mexico http://lnkd.in/bxygsQp

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Aztecs, Toltecs, Mayas are alive, they survived, and they are against the illuminaties, lazies, homosexual among others http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uAO9FE8InY&feature=youtu.be&a#!

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Indian IT companies were invited by Calderon, to start their frauds in PEMEX, http://lnkd.in/bzzQXbh The Indian consultants monopolized the project in SAP, no mexican was involved in this project. It smells fishy and with tax money worse. No a mexican american involved in the project. Smell like a fraud with tax money. Indians work together and they protect each other, but they do not support other kind of people that could disagree with them, allowing that the fraud in government and Corporates. No indian alone has done a complete implementation os SAP in LATAM, You do not know spanish well, legal requirements, you do not know the economic system. I do not want LATAM to suffer as USA for all these IT fraudsThis is a international problem, Corporates supporter for IT indian companies are not paying taxes legally as it suppossed to be made. Countries should look for the consultants to put them in jail.

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    One of master´s degree professor was a college of her, I know that they are right, we want to see the numbers. Fraud using ERP all over the world through IT indian Companies and Indian Consultants. Necesitamos las herramientas, la educación no tiene el nivel adecuado debido a grupos en el poder. http://lnkd.in/bwjACS9 We need the tools, we have a low level of education because these elites. Of course if they do not kill her before

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    The Aztec, Olmecs, Mayas and others are alive in Mexico against the Illuminaties, I hope can be extended to the north of Mexico and South of USA. Integral education at all level to protect our companies and our nation. Bill Gates copied me wrong https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=630317220339709&set=a.628957993808965.1073741825.620414357996662&type=1&theater

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Calderon and Fox used the international legal and illegal security network in USA and
    Mexico against me, after a comment on line in Excelsior and Universal about the
    issue of two plagiarisms of Fox in Mexico at Universidad Iberoamericana for hic
    Bachelor´s degree and also in his thesis presented at an American University
    for his PhD. It was long time ago but since then he has been using the
    international legal and illegal security network in USA and Mexico against me
    for almost three years, as a personal issue. Also I used to work in Hildebrando,
    Calderon´s family business and both of them decided to use this international
    legal and illegal security network in USA and Mexico against me because of my comments on line about the plagiarism of Fox using government documents as Theses. The Lazies are winning over the world. They only copy or stole the copyrights of others. The Lazies are using fake educational level. They do not have any degree. http://t.co/KhIGtxd6sQ

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Los modelos macroeconómicos y microeconómicos mexicanos del TLC han sido repetidos en otras partes del mundo dejando millones en la pobresa extrema.
    Mexican Macroeconomic and microeconomic models of NAFTA have been repeated in other parts of the world leaving millions in extreme poverty. http://www.proceso.com.mx/?p=351991

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    I think that Mexico and USA may be better than India, if we let the mexican and US PhD and scientists work together in each module of the ERP, and créate something really advance for our civilization, mexican american should be working together for a new Era. The true is that the mexican and US education is without direction, to have it, it is necessary to unify all the level of education, and structure the knowledge by modules at all the levels to créate the productivity models, I created. The mexican and US government should work at all levels of the mexican and US education and structure the knowledge in the way to be more productive, protect our companies, our Nation. No podemos dejar las empresas mexicanas y americanas en manos de estos tipos por falta de acuerdos en el sector educativo, realmente falta un reforma educativa que redunde productivamente en el sistema mexicano y americano.

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Spread the world of who created the ERP technology and its Data Base Technology http://t.co/kEUBxxv276 Oracle starting operations does not spend any penny in my own ideas, PEMEX paid everything for the business data base and the business software. Of course to SAP, they use NSA or similar spy system. But IMP and PEMEX are full of spies.

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Obama is using CPS against iT consultants and finance ttop managers . http://lnkd.in/bEeAMkH

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    The SAP FICO indian consultants, they do not have knowledge of basic accounting and industrial engineering knowledge for american companies as well as no knowledge of capitalism or other economic system. Estas usando a los Indios para hacer fraudes fiscales y contables tanto en empresas como en el sector público. There are using indian consultants to make fiscal and accounting frauds in Corporates and Government. There are some indian consultant that only using Vertix, they are giving a complete soluton in taxes world wide. Can you believe it? Lazies No es solo Oracle o SAP, la tecnología es para estudiantes de preparatoria, no usan tecnología de licenciaturas menos de maestría y doctorado. La tecnología que usan en los ERP esta soprepasada actualmente, usan tecnología de bajo nivel para hacer fraudes fiscales y contables actualmente

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Illuminati media maniputation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGMg3A0Rb5I&feature=youtu.be and Mexican illuminaties http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy6gBNhkSQg&feature=youtu.be#! Companies abroad are trusting them too much, they are giving to high positions to family members but it is worthy, too much corruption. It is ridiculous that China is cheaper than Mexico, when distribution to the USA costs more than production. There should be something fishy. Walmart that it is selling drugs in their parkings and whose employees need to receive government assitance, paid to mexican politians money to agree to sell the mexican oil company while “fast and furious” was making its way in the same direction. Obama is a drug dealer, helping Sinaloa Cartel. He uses the NSA and other agencies to help him in his illlegal businesses. PEMEX, the mexican and american government related to the drug market

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    This guy is getting crazy when he does not have all the Universe knowledge by himself. Lazy Group is getting out of the road . Stop using devices of acupuncture pre-programmed using the illuminati network or stolen copyrights or may be killing their authors http://lnkd.in/bR4639y The lazy illuminaties want to make us believe that anybody can be them, but the real situation is that rates are lower, working without benefits most of the time. Less american labor environment. We hate Obama involved in IT criminal acts. You forgot gay, muslim, socialist, communist, Kenyan… What am I forgetting? Then there is the HARP weapons… And Acorn… Obamaphones… The fly that landed on his face which was a sign of the devil… UN coming to take all the guns… Fema camps… His wife suggested we drink more water…

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Bill Gates es el diablo en la compra de PEMEX. Mexicans and foreigners working for The illuminaties are trying to get the mexican oil company to them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnIPmDNgCPA&feature=youtube_gdata_player They already are owners of USA and are trying to move fast to the south. Go away Istlamo Nazis from Mexico. They are using a complex system, the head of the lazies is Bill Gates. But we créate the system, the lazy group copied wrong. Bill Gates asked for Mexican Petroleum Institute personnel to work for him in the MS-DOS, really basic system, seems to be created by him. Everybody respected his copyrights. But today he is stolen copyrights everywhere. According with Bill Gates, PEMEX is a monopoly and this has to change. But also Microsoft is monopoly world wide, and they do not respect the copyright as a matter of fact they are stolen them, it seems that in some cases they are killing the authors, using the illuminati network world wide, Indian Istlamo Nazis are included. Mexico is out of touch geting involved with the american government that it is full inflitrated with Istlamo Nazis at this time. they are killinng christians and catholics all over the world with fast speed.

  • Adalberto Cervantes Rodriguez

    Ataco a la periodista mexicana, dado que puso en ridículo al Director de Pemex, mostrando su total incapacidad en el puesto, Televisa la mando por eso a atacarla directamente. Aristegui mostro una maestría total en las preguntas que le hizo al Director de Pemex, lo puso en ridículo, Mexicans dislike liers specially if they are foreigners. Criminals are receiving visas from Mexico and United States. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DJkdMU1TyZc#t=107 It looks that a sickness starting with Istlamo Nazi Indian consultants is spreading the world because they do not kno basic economy, and for sure we need capitalist models at this time again. To be a liar in Mexico about economy, accounting is really dangerous. Pretty risky

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 5: The Mysterious Mr. de Mohrenschildt - Investing Video & Audio Jay Taylor Media

  • Pingback: The Close Friend of George H.W. Bush and Lee Harvey Oswald
 | Michigan Standard

  • Pingback: Dallas Clarke's Jewish News » The Close Friend of George H.W. Bush and Lee Harvey Oswald


  • Pingback: The Close Friend of George H.W. Bush and Lee Harvey Oswald


  • ANnominus

    Some may inquire into Georgy Schraf/f a.k.a Curious George of Dr. ZeUS fame and consider Otto Skorzany and Their DEEP INNER CIRCLE in the Hiltler Klub of Der Fatherland and the likely emanation from Project Paper CLIP that may have Brought Georgy a.k.a G.H.W. from the Brown Harriman Hariman Prescot Bush I.G. Farben Kuhn and Loeb associations to The NEW Frontier for the 5th Reich? NO not Robert? Where did all those SECRET UNDERGROUD Base TechnoCrazies Idiotologics come From?

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 7: Empire Strikes Back - Investing Video & Audio Jay Taylor Media

  • Pingback: Bush #1 and the JFK Hit


  • Pingback: Bush #1 and the JFK Hit | Sharing Liberty

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 8: Prepping a Patsy? - Investing Video & Audio Jay Taylor Media

  • Pingback: Prepping a Patsy | Michigan Standard

  • Pingback: Prepping a Patsy | Sharing Liberty

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 9: Planning a Nightmare on Elm Street - Investing Video & Audio Jay Taylor Media

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 10: After Camelot - Investing Video & Audio Jay Taylor Media

  • Pingback: 50th Anniversary of JFK Assassination | VICTORYPOST

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 2: Skull and Bones Forever | WhoWhatWhy

  • Pingback: Bush and The JFK Hit, Part 3: Where was Poppy November 22, 1963? | WhoWhatWhy

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 4: Barbara’s Hair-Raising Day | WhoWhatWhy

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 5: The Mysterious Mr. de Mohrenschildt | WhoWhatWhy

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 6: The Cold War Comes to Dallas | WhoWhatWhy

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 7: Empire Strikes Back | WhoWhatWhy

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 8: Prepping a Patsy? | WhoWhatWhy

  • Pingback: Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 10: After Camelot | WhoWhatWhy

  • IMPOed

    Call me naive, but these “conspiracy theories” will never see the light of day, I, myself, have no doubt JFK was murdered by his own country, but as long as there are trillions of dollars and the most powerful men in the world protecting the lies will anyone, (the multitude of boobs asses) believe otherwise!
    With the new technologies such as the web and instant messaging, maybe the affronts against our humanity will become fewer, but past atrocities will remain hidden forever!

    • herefornow

      The dots are practically connecting themselves at this point. Nothing remains hidden forever.

  • Pingback: Late Night Open Thread: Me, I’m Praying for A Meteor » Balloon Juice

More in Criminal Justice, Fresh Takes, Our Investigations (138 of 813 articles)