Support WhoWhatWhy
FRESH TAKES | news, content and perspective you might not find elsewhere

Why You Need WhoWhatWhy to Grow

snob2

I’ve seen it again and again throughout my career. The mainstream media (MSM) puts out a story narrative that is woefully inadequate or even entirely false. But because they are the primary information source for key people in our society—newsmakers, politicians, writers, etc—the false story is the only one that gets out there.

When some enterprising individual or outsider news media discovers the real truth, they are ignored by the MSM, and therefore the “chattering class” that depends on the MSM remains in the dark. And the public at large that is at the bottom of this pyramid is left utterly clueless.

That, in short, is how the one percent stay on top. Control the minds of those whom we trust to know more than we do—and to explain the world to us.

Here’s the most recent example: Scrutinizing cables relating to former CIA director David Petraeus, we discovered new information indicating that the real story behind his ouster in an adultery scandal might have run much deeper. It showed that Petraeus was suspected of having an affair several years earlier than previously known, and that parties engaged in an intense competition to influence policy likely knew about it—and may have been waiting to use that information.

We put our story out—and, because of our growing reach, we were able to disseminate it relatively far and wide. But even so, we could only reach a fraction of the “chattering class.” This means that the vast majority of those who believe themselves well informed know nothing of this deeper story. It also means that when their better-informed friends, who read WhoWhatWhy, tell them about it, they are likely to dismiss it out of hand. “Why wasn’t it in the New York Times..or on NPR?” they will say dismissively.

This means that the very people we turn to for wisdom and guidance actually know less than we do. Yet, because they are in positions of influence, their lack of knowledge acts as a suppressor of information to the population at large.

I find this constantly here in New York; when I encounter top media people, I find out how poorly informed they are about deeper explanations, new revelations, etc. They truly are the keepers of the “official story”—if not by design, then by accident.

Hence our mission. And your chance to help. The more you tell people about WhoWhatWhy, and that there’s an alternative place to get thoughtful, non-predictable, original reporting, the more people will come. And at some point, the balance will tip.

 

 

WhoWhatWhy plans to continue doing this kind of groundbreaking original reporting. You can count on it. But can we count on you? We cannot do our work without your support.

Please click here to donate; it’s tax deductible. And it packs a punch.

 

GRAPHIC: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-UAdL8t0-E0Y/TyFwZ0rcVzI/AAAAAAAAAWM/_WgUn7oe1bs/s1600/snob2.jpg


Comment Policy:
Keep it civil. Keep it relevant. Keep it clear. Keep it short. Identify your assertions as fact or speculation. No typing in ALL-CAPS. Read the article in its entirety before commenting.

Note: As a news site dedicated to serious inquiry, not a bulletin board, we reserve the right to remove any comment at any time, especially when it appears to be part of an effort to push a deceptive, unscientific, false or narrow ideological line. Posts that scapegoat by ethnicity, gender, religion or nationality will also be removed.
  • http://www.facebook.com/teace.snyder Teace Snyder

    Your base contention of people being ill informed because of the mainstream news is spot on and your further contention that people will disregard stories they haven’t heard on the mainstream news is as well. However, I feel cognitive dissonance plays a role in this process too. For even great independent news websites such as whowhatwhy.com won’t touch certain hot button issues, regardless of their merits, simply because of the association of such claims to what, from the vantage point of the mainstream, is labled as the fringe. Thus, truth plays hide and seek behind political ideologies. And, consequently, cognitive dissonance bias’ dictate how much of the whole truth gets out, whether it’s in our own minds, in our conversations with each other, or to the greater public at large.

  • http://www.911Blogger.com/ Orangutan.
  • Fullblad

    I think it would be interesting to run some polls to determine just what the people’s knowledge is on key narratives effecting their lives and where they sourced their information and when (did it take years before they received the facts?). This would inform “alternate” news publishers and their readers as to what we’re up against.

    • Russ

      That’s a fine idea. Any pollsters care to volunteer their services? Please contact us.

      • Fullblad

        Russ, Perhaps sharing the cost with other sites according to available finances with a call for donations for the specific costs/purpose might do he trick

  • Westcoastliberal

    The “official story” on 911 is the perfect example of this. Now at this late date, most of the sheeple will brand you as a “conspiracy nut” if you dare to question this “official story”.

More in Criminal Justice, Fresh Takes, Our Investigations (142 of 817 articles)