Support WhoWhatWhy
FRESH TAKES | news, content and perspective you might not find elsewhere

Quick Thought: Alawites and Other Religious Minorities

Alawites in Turkey

Americans (and others who support the uprising in Syria) frequently assert that President Assad’s co-religionists, the Alawites, have undue power. The reason: they are a minority in Syria.

Here’s one variation, from the New York Times:

Alawites, the president’s sect, dominate Syria, but many orthodox Muslims view them as a heretical offshoot of Shiite Islam.

The notion that only majorities should rule is not new. The implication is that minorities have accrued an unfair advantage because their members work together to help one another stay on top. Critiques about disproportionate Jewish influence are a longtime staple. And if this same principle were applied consistently, articles about the November election might well declare (and perhaps do, abroad):

Mormons, Mitt Romney’s sect, have disproportionate influence, but many orthodox Christians view them as a heretical offshoot of Christianity.

Yet when it comes to Middle East policy, we have the strange situation of Romney, a Mormon; Joe Lieberman, a Jew; and Barack Obama, an African-American, suggesting that a minority clique should not dominate Syria.

They seem to be suggesting that Middle Eastern countries—most of which do not have democratic systems—would at least profit from rule by a tyrannical ethnic majority clique.

In fact, the population of Bahrain, a US ally, is 70 percent Shiite.  But, in a reverse of the situation in Syria, the country is run by elements of a Sunni minority. Nonetheless, we have not heard Romney, Lieberman or Obama call for the Bahraini regime’s ouster.

As with many other purported principles, this “minority clique” concern is raised only selectively— and for reasons having nothing whatsoever to do with ensuring that majorities prevail.

# #

 

 

GRAPHIC: http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/thumbnail_landing/alawites2.jpeg


Comment Policy:
Keep it civil. Keep it relevant. Keep it clear. Keep it short. Identify your assertions as fact or speculation. No typing in ALL-CAPS. Read the article in its entirety before commenting.

Note: As a news site dedicated to serious inquiry, not a bulletin board, we reserve the right to remove any comment at any time, especially when it appears to be part of an effort to push a deceptive, unscientific, false or narrow ideological line. Posts that scapegoat by ethnicity, gender, religion or nationality will also be removed.
  • Abdullah

    the problem maybe not minority or majority, shiite has a long history of hostility with sunni. In fact shiite is reaction from the defeated nation like iran again the triumph of Islam.

  • Guest

    US opposition to ruling Alawite sect in Syria is behind the scenes being supported by Wahhabist (radical Islamite) Saudi Arabian government. Their hand is everywhere that Shiites are being harrassed or worse by Sunnis.
    The US favors the main source of our oil supplies–Saudi–hence US policy on Syria’s current situation.

More in Criminal Justice, Fresh Takes, Our Investigations (148 of 823 articles)