Support WhoWhatWhy
FRESH TAKES | news, content and perspective you might not find elsewhere

Letters to Jackie, But What About Jack? How to Avoid the Heart of the JFK Assassination

When it comes to the biggest and most troubling stories of our time, corporate-owned and conventional public news outlets have a tendency to do an end run around the controversy and go straight to the most emotionally satisfying but least consequential aspects.

Take the assassination of the 35th president. Recently, the media were full of accounts on a book about condolence letters to Jackie K. Here’s the New York Times:

For a new book, “Letters to Jackie: Condolences From a Grieving Nation,” released by HarperCollins, Ellen Fitzpatrick, a historian, culled through the archives. Now she has published about 250 letters, most for the first time, from people around the country who felt compelled to write to Mrs. Kennedy.  The letters, many of them eloquent expressions of grief – from a priest in an Eskimo village, schoolchildren in Texas, a middle-class family in California, a widow in Pittsburgh, a Louisiana woman with a fourth-grade education – provide a window into Americans struggling with poverty, fighting for civil rights and trying to comfort themselves and others in the face of the president’s death. “The lights of the prison have gone out now,” wrote Stephen J. Hanrahan, Prisoner 85255, from a federal penitentiary in Atlanta. “In this, the quiet time, I can’t help but feel, that my thoughts and the thoughts of my countrymen will ever reach out to that light on an Arlington hillside for sustenance. How far that little light throws his beam.”

It’s all very poignant, but what about the assassination itself? How much effort does The Times make to keep its readers posted on developments in research about how and why the President died? Well, almost none. The paper of record almost uniformly avoids covering what has been for many years a steady stream of investigative breakthroughs on the issue. And while it did find space for “Letters to Jackie,” it did not even mention, much less review,  James Douglass’s JFK and the Unspeakable, Jefferson Morley’s Our Man in Mexico, or Family of Secrets (by yours truly), nor dozens of other carefully-documented and footnoted books by skilled diggers that suggest the Warren Commission’s version of events is, well, totally wrong on virtually every count. (In the case of Morley, he was actually mentioned in a Times article, which began with the remarkable clause, “Is the Central Intelligence Agency covering up some dark secret about the assassination of John F. Kennedy? Probably not.” The article actually managed to refer to Morley as an author researching Kennedy’s death without ever citing the title or substance of Morley’s book. David Talbot’s Brothers was reviewed, but put up against a book by a prosecutor contending that Oswald acted alone.)

Not to pick on The Times-this is the norm with most U.S. news organizations, including public radio and television.  The foreign media, however, is much less reticent about the JFK story. And therein lies the real question-Why can this country’s media establishment not touch this transcendent domestic tragedy and timeless mystery?


Comment Policy:
Keep it civil. Keep it relevant. Keep it clear. Keep it short. Identify your assertions as fact or speculation. No typing in ALL-CAPS. Read the article in its entirety before commenting.

Note: As a news site dedicated to serious inquiry, not a bulletin board, we reserve the right to remove any comment at any time, especially when it appears to be part of an effort to push a deceptive, unscientific, false or narrow ideological line. Posts that scapegoat by ethnicity, gender, religion or nationality will also be removed.
  • Pingback: JFK Assassination? | Americans Against Lies

  • http://bytheearlylight.blogspot.com/ Early Light

    Where did I hear this? Was it your interview on Boiling Frogs? If Americans were told that the some Latin American or African or even European nation’s government officials were involved in a coup and assassination of their own president, there would be no surprise. Someone dares to suggest the same thing could happen here, and gets laughed off the continent.

  • http://jcrows.com J. Crow

    Maybe there is hope that “this transcendent domestic tragedy ” has not
    been lost on another new generation
    Singer Erykah Badu strips at JFK assassination site in new video:
    http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Music/03/29/erykah.badu.strips/index.html?hpt=C2
    Clearly Nov 22 1963 was leading to this on September 11 2001
    http://bigeye.com/911mysteries.htm

  • http://www.arbitrarynation.com/ David Jarvis

    Russ,

    Your own biases are glaring. The tone of this article seems to suggest that truth is the rule and secrecy is the exception. Sorry, but I think you need to recheck your history.

    Sure, coming from a journalistic background it is part of your training to believe in the market value of truth, and your industry would be nothing if the illusion of truth wasn’t omnipresent. However, truth has a market value first and foremost as a claim to authority. In other words, to be able to claim truth is the most important aspect of journalism. And you can do that with 10% truth.

    In history, the importance of truth was never that any news organization was ever 100% truthful, but that some were less than 1% truthful, and eventually a crisis of authority ensued.

    I suggest that if you want the truth about the Kennedy assassination to be brought to light you either:

    put lewd images on your site.
    include video games and youtube music clips
    get some humor writers on staff
    start your own freakshow section of your site
    do like Alex Jones and produce sensational videos

    …or, you put some heavy opinion pieces out there that knock heads together and become a real threat. If you don’t go that last mile and make some insinuations you lose to the all too opinionated competition.

    I would remind you that the only news organizations that get the kennedy assassination truth out are porn magazines, Rolling Stone, and unpaid blogs.

    Perhaps you need to study your competition.

  • AL

    Why can this country’s media establishment not touch this transcendent domestic tragedy and timeless mystery?

    Fear.
    Why fear?
    Because you live in a military state but won’t admit it to yourselves.
    Because the very same war machine that was behind the JFK assassination is still very alive today, it’s components have mostly all been replaced along the way by today (those involved mostly all died by now) but the machine is bigger and stronger than it has ever been.

    The same malevolent machine that warped the Warren Commission, allowed the 9/11 events to happen even though they knew ahead, the same machine that let the Christmas bomber board the plane, the same machine that stole U.S. elections and presidency, and on and on.

    In the meantime, Hollywood keeps up it’s military purpose and shines on, like a thick coat of makeup for an old wrinkled woman. We can’t let the world see the U.S.A’s real face.

  • http://jcrows.com J. Crow

    Here is a link to Erykah Badu ‘s brave video_ Window Seat
    http://www.erykahbadu.com/

  • Judy Morris

    Just finished JFK and the Unspeakable – this book is an absolute must read and should be required reading in high schools and colleges. There is no doubt in my mind that JFK was murdered by the CIA and the military industrial complex for the crime of promoting peace and avoiding nuclear war.

    I haven’t gotten to Russ Baker’s Family of Secrets but I did read the Immaculate Deception by Russ Bowen. The Bush crime family must be exposed! Al Martin did a good job exposing the Bush gang.

  • Jfk truth

    Russ , keep up good work …..heres the heads up for you ….the big scoop if you will…..actual video evidence that proves the CIA killed JFK on that fateful day …..get your hands on the ORIGINAL zapruder footage not the warren commssion edited version ….and watch it in slow motion frame 313 is the smoking gun …literally and figuratively….the CIA secret service agent driving the motorcade turns in an instant and shoots JFK in the face ….how much more evidence does anyone need that the CIA was implicit in his murder? The same powers behind this murder were behind the almost 3000 murders on 9/11.

  • Hawkeye

    Mr. Baker, the answer to your question is frightfully simple. Exploring these avenues gets one marginalized as a ‘conspiracy theorist’ or a ‘new world orderite’. It’s fantastic watching the MSM talking heads introduce a non MSM person as one of these terms as to totally discount them. See Marrs, Jim for further details. Look at what happened to Bill Cooper – he got so close they killed him. You have a chance, with your pedigree, to start something here. Hopefully you will.

  • jmach

    the key to the JFK hit was that J. Edgar Hoover was in on the

    plot .. and, when you have the top cop on your side … no

    matter who else … you’re probably going to get away with it.

    Ditto for 9-11… for Silverstein and his Mossad helpers .. there was no better ally than Dick Cheney .. who could get the dunce out of the way, insure no interference and suppress any attempt at a real investigation ……. neat, eh, what??? let that be a lesson:
    it’s not what happened that matters…it’s what your allies can convince people ……….. so if you’re going to demolish buidlings with thermite and cover that over with airplane strikes, pick your conspirators well …
    Hire the Fox guy, with a Harley T-shirt, for example: to say:
    …the fire was just too intense… hohoho….

  • Pingback: JFK-RFK-MLK??? The Questions Remain by Russ Baker | Cold Reality News Report

  • Pingback: Forbidden News » JFK-RFK-MLK

  • Pingback: JFK-RFK-MLK

  • Erick Tippett

    All this about Mr. Kennedy goes on and on and on! Most don’t
    want to admit that the core of American psychology has been
    replete with racism, violence, assassination, domestic intrigue,
    and political stealth. If what I understand Robert Prechter to
    mean in his newly fashioned ‘Socionomic Theory’ domestic
    and world events are shaped in their character by changes in
    public mood, albeit unconsciously. It takes a particular mind
    set to provide the fertile soil for such events to take place and
    we must remember that in some southern schools children
    cheered when they heard the news of Kennedy’s assassination!
    And one must also be aware that at a deeper level of mind Mr. Kennedy’s own death wish as expressed in his obsession with death in ever increasing frequency in the weeks and days
    before his murder in Dallas Texas was a part of the equation
    that allowed this very tragic and highly fated event to manifest.

    • Litchfield

      Very good points, and relevant to my own post regarding James Douglass’s JFK and the Unspeakable. I urge you to read it.. In particular, regarding what you call JFK’s “death wish.” Douglass points out that JFK had lived very close to death all of his life, because of his own serious chronic health issues, and also war injuries, and therefore was not afraid of it. He knew he was a marked man. But he continued on the path he had chosen.

  • Litchfield

    So glad to see a mention of James Douglass’s JFK and the Unspeakable and thus to know that Baker has taken this truly magisterial work on board. Baker exhorts us to read, to inform ourselves and arm ourselves against the continual onslaught of propaganda and triviality. This is, IMO, THE book to read on the macro-level background to the assassination, the micro-level details of how the plot went down, AND the ethical and existential issues raised by the country’s failure to face the truth of why Kennedy was rubbed out, and the significance these events and the forces behind them have for us now. In a certain sense the truth is in plain sight. Douglass’s book is the only one I have read on JFK’s assassination. It makes sense of that event, and so much more. Then add Baker’s Family of Secrets, and you have a pretty good picture of real recent USA history. To round it out, treat yourself to Colin Woodard’s American Nations. This startling and compulsively readable account of American history will provide an invaluable perspective on the regional, material, and value-based conflicts that have motivated the USA and its strategies and state policies from the colonial period down to the present day.

  • Pingback: JFK-RFK-MLK??? The Questions Remain | WhoWhatWhy